|
The Customer:
A subsidiary of a very large bank with global operations set up to create new
avenues of business services, with technology as the driver.
The Challenge:
In a scenario of ill-defined contours of a nascent business concept of
Web-based escrow services, i-flex solutions was required to make a clear requirements
definition. The challenge was to envision the flow of the business from the
buyer/seller contract stage in the exchange site to the ultimate settlement
with the seller. The second important challenge was to provide accounting
safeguards for the numerous exceptional conditions expected to arise, some of
which are:
 |
payment made, but the seller cancels the shipment |
 |
goods shipped, but the buyer rejects a part of the shipment |
 |
shareable escrow fees |
 |
exchange site commission to be paid by the seller |
 |
exchange rate issues with different buyer and seller currencies, as also
currency differences in site commission and exchange fees, among others. |
The challenge was to build internationally-accepted accounting standards into
the system along with audit safeguards even for the most complicated
eventuality.
Recommended Solution:
A two-fold methodology was followed. With the generic accounting flows for each
stage of the transaction clearly defined, we sought to make the concept
comprehensible to business users as well as developers and enable proper
testing by creating actual detailed models. Detailed multi-currency regular and
exception-condition-accounting modes were created with more than forty
envisaged scenarios.
Customer Benefits:
The recommended models equipped the client with:
 |
accounting flows and detailed models covering scenarios expected to arise when the
system went live |
 |
an accounting set-up definition taking complete care of the cash flows arising
out of the customer- and back-office business processes defined for the Web
site. The client's trust in i-flex methodology was such that the concurrence of
the accounting expert deputed by i-flex was considered essential by the client
to ratify any changes to the models |
|